|
|
|
MINUTES
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD REGULAR MEETING
Miami Shores Village
January 02, 2003
The
regularly meeting of the Miami Shores Village Code Enforcement Board was held
on Thursday January 02, 2003, at the Miami Shores Village Hall. The meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m.
by Chairman Barry Asmus.
PRESENT: Barry Asmus, Chairman
Barry Perl
John Patnick
John Busta
Rod
Buenconsejo
ALSO
PRESENT: Al Berg, Code Enforcement
and Planning and Zoning Director
Richard Trumble,
Code Enforcement Supervisor
Anthony
Flores, Code Enforcement Officer
Hillary
Graver, Code Enforcement Officer
Richard
Sarafan, Village Attorney
Irene M.
Fajardo, Administrative Assistant.
ABSENT: Robert Vickers
Manny
Quiroga
1.A) NOVEMBER 7, 2002 MINUTES:
Mr.
Busta made a motion to approve the October 3, 2002 minutes. Mr. Perl seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous in favor.
2.B) FIRST HEARINGS
Case
No: 2002-03241 Owner: Gertha Lalanne and Farrere Dyer
Address: 38 NW 108 St.
Section: 13-1; Inoperable vehicle on premises.
The officer, Anthony Flores, testified that a violation still existed on the property. Pictures were submitted to the Board as evidence of the violation. The property owner, Mr. Dyer, was there to offer testimony on his case. He explained that his intentions were to remove the vehicles, but that one of them had a lien on the title. The Board asked questions in regards to the expired tags on the vehicles. The owner explained that he would place current tags on the vehicles. The Board inquired about what the owner was going to do about the lien on the title. He explained his efforts in trying to resolve the issue of the vehicle that has the lien on the title. After further
Code Enforcement January 2, 2003 Page 2
discussion from the Board, Mr. Perl moved for a finding of fact and a conclusion
of law that a violation exists according to Section 13-1 of the Miami Shores
Village Code. The violator shall
correct the violation in fifteen(15) days and shall immediately notify the Code
Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If compliance is not completed in fifteen(15)
days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board
may then assess a fine against the violator in the amount of $25.00 a day, per
vehicle, starting on the date of
original compliance given in the Notice of Violation. This will constitute a
lien on the property of the violator.
Costs in the amount of $15.00 per violation are hereby assessed to
recoup the Village’s expenses in prosecuting the violations to date. Mr. Buenconsejo seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0.
Case No: 2002-02962 Owner: Antoni and Rhona Charles
Address: 265 NW 92 St.
Section: 12-133;
Unsightly fascia, soffit, house exterior.
The
officer, Hillary Graver, testified that a violation still existed on the
property. Pictures were submitted to
the Board as evidence of the violation.
The property owner, Rhona Charles, was there to offer testimony on her
case. Mrs. Charles explained the she
obtained roof estimates, but that she did not have the money to fix the roof
yet. The Board explained that pressure
cleaning the roof would satisfy the violation.
The owner explained that the roof was leaking and therefore, she was
afraid to pressure clean. She then stated
that she would try to pressure clean very carefully, in order to bring the
property into compliance. After further
discussion from the Board, Mr. Perl moved for a finding of fact and a
conclusion of law that a violation exists according to Section 12-133 of the
Miami Shores Village Code. The violator
shall correct the violation in thirty(30) days and shall immediately notify the
Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. If compliance is not completed in thirty(30)
days, the Code Enforcement Officer is to report back to the Board and the Board
may then assess a fine against the violator in the amount of $25.00 a day
starting on the date of original
compliance given in the Notice of Violation. This will constitute a lien on the
property of the violator. Costs in the
amount of $15.00 per violation are hereby assessed to recoup the Village’s
expenses in prosecuting the violations to date. Mr. Buenconsejo seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0.
Summary
Adjudication:
Cases:
2002-02959, 2974, 2984, 3100, 3106, 3211, 3220, 3238, 3239, 3242, 3268, 3271,
3275, 3291, 3333, 3341, 3440.
Chairman
Asmus read each case and address into the record and asked if anyone was
present. No one was present.
Richard
Trumble testified that Affidavits of Non-Compliance and evidence of violation
existed in each of the files.
Code Enforcement January 2, 2003 Page 3
Mr. Busta
made a motion for a summary adjudication of all such cases to include a finding
of fact and conclusion of law that a violation exists as charged in the
respective notice of violations issued therein and that, in each case, the
offending party will correct the violation within the time period specified by
the staff in the staff recommendations for these hearings, and will immediately
notify the code enforcement officer when the property is brought into
compliance. In each such case, if the
violation is not brought into compliance within such time periods, the code
enforcement officer may report this back to the Board in accordance with the
Board’s rules and regulations at which time a fine is hereby authorized to be
automatically assessed against the violator in the respective daily amounts
specified in staff’s recommendations for tonight’s hearing, retroactive to the
original compliance deadline, which will constitute a lean on the property of
the violator. Further, with respect to
each of the cases, costs in the amounts specified in staff’s recommendations
for tonight’s hearings are hereby assessed in order to recoup the Village’s
expenses in prosecuting the violations to date. Mr. Buenconsejo seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0.
3.C) PENALTY HEARINGS
Summary
Adjudication: Cases: 2002- 02903, 02932, 2935, 3007, 3063.
Mr. Buenconsejo
moved for a summary adjudication of all such cases to include a finding of fact
and conclusion of law that a violation exists as charged in the respective
notice of violations issued therein and that, in each case, the offending party
shall correct the violation within the time period specified by the staff in
the Staff recommendations for these hearings, and shall immediately notify the
Code Enforcement Officer when the property is brought into compliance. In each such case, if the violation is not
brought into compliance within such time period, the Code Enforcement Officer
may report this back to the Board in accordance with the Board’s rules and
Regulations at which time a fine is hereby authorized to be automatically
assessed against the violator in the respective daily amounts specified in
Staff’s recommendations for tonight’s hearing, retroactive to the original
compliance deadline, which will constitute a lean on the property of the
violator. Further, with respect to each
case, costs in the amounts specified in Staff’s recommendations for tonight’s
hearings are hereby assessed in order to recoup the Village’s expenses in
prosecuting the violations to date. Mr.
Perl seconded the motion. Motion passed
5-0.
3.C) REQUEST FOR RELIEF
Case No: 2000-02402 Owner: Shelton
Hill
Address: 123 NW 102 St..
The property owner, Shelton Hill,
was there to offer testimony on the case.
Mr. Shelton explained why it took a long time to bring the property into
compliance. The owners paid the total lien amount of $4, 690.00 and
were asking for a return of that money.
Mr. Patnick made a
Code Enforcement January 2, 2003 Page 4
motion to accept the offer of
$500.00 subject to the Village Manager’s approval. Mr. Buenconsejo seconded the motion. Motion passed 3-2. Mr.
Asmus and Mr. Perl voted no.
Case No: 2000-00623 Owner: Marie Baptiste
Address: 269 NE 103 St.
The
property owner, Marie Baptiste, was there to offer testimony on the case. Ms. Baptiste explained why she had taken so
long to come into compliance. A copy of
the permit was submitted to the Board as evidence of compliance. After further discussion from the Board, Mr.
Perl made a motion to accept the offer of $500.00 payable within 30 days or the
lien reverts back to the original amount.
Mr. Buenconsejo seconded the motion.
Motion passed 3-2. Mr. Asmus and
Mr. Patnick voted no.
Case No: 2000-00782, 783 Owner: Henry
Volpe
Address:
36 NW 101 St.
The
property owner, Henry Volpe, was there to offer testimony on his case. Mr. Volpe explained the reasons why it took
a long time to bring the property into compliance. He stated that the notices were send to the previous owner and
that he never received them. Mr. Volpe
amended his offer to $500.00. After
further discussion, Mr. Perl made a motion to accept the offer of $500.00
payable within 30 days or the lien reverts back to the original amount. Mr. Buenconsejo seconded the motion. Motion passed 4-1. Mr. Asmus voted no.
Case No: 2000-00359, 2054 Owner: Marcella
Gressi
2055 Address:
66 NW 107 St.
The owner, Marcela Gressi, and her attorney, Daniel
Jonas, were there to offer testimony on the case. Ms. Gressi had previously made an offer of $6973.50,
which was not paid in the time specified by the Board. After further discussion from the Board, Mr. Buenconsejo
made a motion to accept the previous offer of $6,9735.00 payable within 30
days, or the lien reverts back to the original amount. Mr. Perl seconded the motion. Motion passed 4-1. Mr. Asmus, voted no.
Case
No: 4952, 4953, 4954 Owner: Ximena Johnson
5349, 5355 Address: 5 NE 105 St.
The
owner, Ximena Johnson, was there to offer testimony on her case. Ms. Johnson has come before the Board for
Request for relief several times before.
She made an offer of $5,000.00 of the total lien amount of $173,
672.99. After further discussion from
The Board, Mr. Patnick made a motion to deny the offer of $5,000.00. Mr. Busta seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0.
Code Enforcement January 2, 2003 Page 5
Case No: 2000-01956 Owner: Colin Morris
Address: 1066 NE 94 St.
The
owner, Colin Morris, was there to offer testimony on her case. Mr. Morris explained the reasons why it took
him so long to bring the property into compliance and stated that he was not
aware of the procedures in regards to placing liens. After further
discussion, Mr. Perl made a motion to accept the offer of $500.00 payable
within 15 days or the lien reverts back to the original amount. Mr. Buenconsejo seconded the motion. Motion passed 4-1. Mr. Asmus voted no.
Case No.: 7814, 7815, 7816 Owner: Junon Salomon
Address: 61 NE 93 St.
The
owner, Junon Salomon and his nephew, were there to offer testimony on the case.
Mr. Salomon’s nephew explained that his uncle had a stroke and therefore, could
not bring the property into compliance in a timely manner. After further discussion, Mr. Buenconsejo
made a motion to accept an offer of $8,500 00 payable in 30 days or the lien
reverts back to the original amount.
Mr. Busta seconded the motion.
Motion passed 3-2. Mr. Patnick
and Mr. Asmus voted no.
Case No.: 6963, 6964, 7680 Owner: Andre Sylvain
8954, 8955, 8958 Address: 42 NW 107 St.
The
property owner, Andre Sylvain and his attorney Aileen Raigman were there to
offer testimony on the case. Ms.
Raigman explained why the property took a long time to come into
compliance. She explained that Mr.
Sylvain was old and had financial difficulties. She also stated that he had no one to call for help. After further discussion, Mr. Perl made a
motion to accept the offer of $5,800.00 payable in 30 days or the lien reverts
back to the original amount. Mr. Buenconsejo
seconded the motion. Motion passed 3-2. Mr. Patnick and Mr. Asmus voted no.
4.D) ADJOURNMENT:
Mr. Perl
made a motion for adjournment. Mr. Buenconsejo
seconded the motion. Motion passed 5-0. The January 2, 2003, meeting of the Code
Enforcement Board was adjourned at 8:30 P.M.
____________________________________
Mr.
Barry Asmus, Chairman
________________________________
Irene
M. Fajardo, Recording Secretary